Below is a link to a USF&W Service document outlining the process of
adding animals to the list of injurious wildlife and providing general
information on injurious wildlife
http://www.fws.gov/contaminants/ANS/pdf_files/InjuriousWildlifeFactSheet2007.pdf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------

Marshall Meyers, the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council’s executive
vice president and general counsel interviewed USFWS staff, and PIJAC
and the USFWS provided kingsnake.com with the following Q&A.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------

Marshall Meyers: What was the motivation for the Federal Register
notice?

USFWS: The recent NOI is our first step in better understanding the
issue of potential environmental impacts of released pet snakes. We’re
hoping that this Q&A will help people to better understand what the
recent notice is, and what it is not.

In August 2006, the Fish and Wildlife Service was petitioned by South
Florida Water Management District to list the Burmese python (Python
molurus bivittatus) as an injurious wildlife species. Scientific
information is required in an injurious wildlife evaluation, and we wanted to
look at these three constrictor snake genera (Boa, Python, Eunectes) to
see if there were other similar species that might pose an environmental
risk. We kept the notice broad so we wouldn’t exclude a species that
could impact native species and perhaps be of concern.

What is the most valuable information for your effort?

We are hoping for biological information, such as potential range,
diet, longevity, size of species at maturity, reproduction, differences
between captive-bred animals and wild animals, etc. We are also looking
for information on existing programs to reduce the potential for pet
snakes to be released into the wild. Responses need not be limited to the
questions listed in the NOI.

Why are you also requesting economic information?

We currently have little information about the value of domestic trade
in these species, and it is our responsibility as part of this process
to gather a range of information on the species of interest. This
includes economic data.

What do you plan to do with this information?

We will use this information to help understand the potential risks and
develop outreach to prevent the release of unwanted pets. If
well-documented impacts to wildlife and the environment are identified, we may
use this information to initiate an injurious wildlife evaluation on one
or more species, a process that would invite public review and
comment. We may also use the information to work with states that are
interested in permitting systems.

In what ways can PIJAC or other groups and the USFWS work more closely
together on this issue?

We don’t want to see pet snakes released into the wild. We previously
worked closely with PIJAC to develop an outreach campaign called
Habitattitude™, which focuses on preventing the release of unwanted
aquatic pets and plants. We are currently expanding this campaign to include
reptile and amphibian pets.

Is there anything else that you want snake enthusiasts to know?

Just as a better scientific understanding of the needs of reptiles has
allowed us to be more responsible caretakers of our pets, a better
understanding of the potential impacts of these pets in the wild allows us
a fuller appreciation of the environmental consequences in releasing
our unwanted pets into the wild.

Please visit www.regulations.gov to submit your comments and data.
Also, it is important to keep in mind that despite the central website
name, this NOI is not a proposed regulation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------

PIJAC PetAlert February 11, 2008  (US FWS Snakes)


FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SEEKING INFORMATION ON CERTAIN CONSTRICTOR
SNAKES

The Issue.

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is currently
reviewing available biological
and economic information and asking for any information from the public
on constrictor snakes
from the Python, Boa and Eunectes genera for possible addition of some
of these species to the
list of injurious wildlife under the Lacey Act. (NOTE: Even though it
published in the
Proposed Rules section of the Federal Register, this is NOT a
rulemaking proposal - it is
only a fact finding initiative.)

After reviewing data received, the Service will carefully consider
whether further analyses may
be useful for certain species. They will also use this information to
help communicate the
potential risks of feral constrictors and expand outreach to prevent
the release of unwanted pets.
They might also use the information to work with states that are
interested in permitting systems.

What does an injurious wildlife listing mean?
• An injurious wildlife listing prohibits the importation and
interstate transport of the
species, gametes, viable eggs and hybrids between States, the District
of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the U.S.
by any means.
• Even if ever listed, an injurious wildlife designation does not
prohibit State possession,
sale, etc. within a state. (However, a state law may apply)
• Permits may be granted by the Service for the importation or
transportation of specimens
of injurious species and their offspring or eggs for bona fide
scientific, medical,
educational, or zoological purposes. The Service will regulate all
movement, including
intrastate transportation, of a species for which a permit has been
issued.
• If a species was obtained prior to the effective date of a rule, a
listing does not prohibit
intrastate transport or possession of species within States, where not
prohibited by the
State. Any regulation pertaining to the use of species within States
continues to be the
responsibility of each State.

The Impact.

In order to determine if further evaluation and stakeholder
consultations may be warranted, the
Fish and Wildlife Service published this notice of inquiry to solicit
biological, economical and
other data, through public comments, on constrictor snakes from the
Python, Boa and Eunectes
genera. Information collected will be used to determine if any snakes
within these genera are a
threat, or potential threat, to wildlife, wildlife resources, humans or
interests of forestry,
horticulture and agriculture in the U.S. In the long run, if any of
these snakes are listed as
injurious wildlife they could not be imported into the U.S. or
transported into or between states,
the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico or any territory/possession of
the U.S. by any means
without a permit. Permits may be issued only for bona fide scientific,
medical, educational or
zoological purposes. (NOTE: Prior to listing, FWS must conduct a
science-based biological
analysis and economic analyses and seek additional public comment.)

The FWS is seeking public comments and supporting biological data on
the snakes in question.
In an attempt to notify people of the types of information they need,
FWS has asked for
comments on the following questions: (NOTE: Responses need not be
limited to these
questions, but it would be strategic to address them.
• What regulations does your State have pertaining to the use,
transport or production of
Python, Boa and Eunectes genera?
• How many species in the Python, Boa and Eunectes genera are
currently in production
for wholesale or retail sale, and in how many and which States?
• How may businesses sell Python, Boa or Eunectes species?
• How many businesses breed Python, Boa or Eunectes species?
• What are the annual sales for Python, Boa or Eunectes species?
• Please provide the number of Python, Boa or Eunectes species, if
any, permitted within
each State.
• What would it cost to eradicate Python, Boa or Eunectes individuals
or populations, or
similar species, if found?
• What are the costs of implementing propagation, recovery and
restoration programs for
native species that are affected by Python, Boa or Eunectes species, or
similar snake
species?
• What State-listed species would be impacted by the introduction of
Python, Boa or
Eunectes species?
• What species have been impacted, and how, by Python, Boa or
Eunectes species?

Recommended Action.

We ask that you withhold submitting your comments until close to the
April 30 deadline in order
to allow PIJAC time to provide you with guidance and information that
will help you prepare
effective comments. PIJAC is currently engaging in meetings with the
FWS and gathering
information to assist you on this issue. Again, please note, that this
is not a proposed rulemaking
notice – it is only a notice to gather information, especially
biological, on these particular snakes.
PIJAC is also undertaking an extensive literature search of
peer-reviewed articles, lay magazines,
and books to gather relevant information to respond to the questions
raised by the FWS. Anyone
who has copies of articles or other pertinent information on the
biology of any of the species
should send them to PIJAC at info@pijac.org AND to PIJAC’s Senior
Science and Policy
Advisor, Dr. Jamie K. Reaser:pijacscience@nelsoncable.com. Dr. Reaser
is compiling a
database which PIJAC will use this information to develop a formal
science-based response on
behalf of the industry and hobbyists as well as provide information for
people to use in crafting
their comments.

Thirdly, PIJAC is conducting a survey of concerned members of the
herpetoculture community
and the industry to collect data to answer the questions posed by the
FWS regarding numbers of
breeders, animals sold, economic questions, etc. This information will
be consolidated and
presented as summaries of data received without identifying individuals
supplying the
information. The FWS is very aware of the concerns of many people about
revealing their
identity. If you are interested in providing herpetoculture data to
PIJAC, please contact PIJAC at
info@pijac.org. All proprietary data (i.e. contributors’ identity,
numbers of animals, financial
data) will be treated as confidential information and will only be seen
by PIJAC staff.
We urge you to review this notice carefully and consider the
implications that could come as a
result of listing these snakes as injurious wildlife. If you have
further questions concerning this
matter, please contact PIJAC’s Marshall Meyers by phone at
202-452-1525 or by email at
mmeyers@pijac.org. Those who are not members of PIJAC and desire
further information about
membership may phone Nancy Knutson at 1-800-553-PETS (7387) or visit
the PIJAC website at
www.pijac.org.

Where to send your comments:

FWS will be receiving comments and other information on this issue
until April 30, 2008. You
may submit comments by one of the following methods:
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing, Attn: RIN
1018-AV68,
Division of Policy and Directives Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 4401
North Fairfax Drive, Suite 222, Arlington, VA 22203; or
• Website: www.regulations.gov (Follow instructions for submitting
comments. In the
“comments or submissions” box type in keyword: “injurious
wildlife”. This should take
you to the comment page.).
FWS will not accept e-mail or faxes, and will post all comments on
http://www.regulations.gov.
This generally means that FWS will post any personal information you
provide. For further
information contact Erin Williams, Branch of Invasive Species at (703)
358-2034 or
erin_williams@fws.gov.

Not Yet a PIJAC Member?
For more than thirty-five years, the Pet Industry Joint Advisory
Council (PIJAC) has ensured the
prosperity of the pet industry. To learn more about PIJAC, please visit
our website at
www.pijac.org. For further information, please send an e-mail to
members@pijac.org or phone
1-800-553-PETS (1-800-553-7387).
Our Business IS Your Business. PIJAC: Keeping You in Business.


 You can get atomatic updates sent to your e-mail by going to http://news.pethobbyist.com/index.cgi/u/herplaw/